# Contested concept: ai alignment

_**What you are reading**: one contested-concept page in Deliberus's deliberation graph. Deliberus maps human reasoning — including claims that are contested, mistaken, or extreme — so that disagreement can be examined precisely. A claim's presence here is not an endorsement: the graph records that someone argued it, how it connects to other reasoning, and how far scrutiny has gotten. The metadata on this page describes the state of that scrutiny, not the truth of the claim._

---

- **Contestedness**: criterion
- **Diagnosis**: The disagreement over alignment masks a deeper political and ethical conflict: who gets to decide the 'values' that the AI is aligned with? If alignment is subjective, then 'safe' AI for one group could be 'oppressive' AI for another.
- **Canonical**: `/concept/ai alignment` (data: `/concept/ai alignment.json`)